Member discussion regarding the methods, varieties and merits of growing tomatoes.
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
May 27, 2008 | #1 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,027
|
Brandy Boy F5 report
From what I can tell so far, BB F5 seems to be stable and comparable to BB F1 in all important respects. I'm growing two plants. Seeds were from Mischka, as he has been working with this for a while. Plant habit, # of fruit set, fruit size/shape/locules, and taste, etc. are indistinguishable from F1 for both plants.
Will try and post pics later when I have some more that fully ripen. I ate and/or saved seeds from the first few posthaste, and didn't bother to take pics yet. |
May 27, 2008 | #2 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
Suze, Mischka said he had some reds coming out of saved BB seed.
What happened to those in terms of following through? And since red is dominant to pink how could a red be a parent? OK, I'll confess that I've never understood the possible parentage of BB from what folks have posted about saved seeds in the past.
__________________
Carolyn |
May 27, 2008 | #3 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,027
|
Quote:
These F5 seeds were sent to me as something that he felt was stable or fairly stable in terms of being an OP version of Brandy Boy, which we have both grown and liked. That is also what I am seeing so far with my spring growout of two plants each of BB F1 and BB F5. |
|
May 27, 2008 | #4 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 630
|
Isn't this a cross between Brandywine and Better Boy? I remember hearing about it before last year for the first time.
I'd bet a backcross to the Brandywine would make a pretty decent F1...or not. Just musing. |
May 27, 2008 | #5 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
Chris, just b'c of the name Brandy Boy lots of folks have suggested that the two parents might be Brandywine and Better Boy, but there's absolutely no way to know that and there never will be without DNA restriction analysis.
__________________
Carolyn |
May 28, 2008 | #6 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 942
|
Carolyn,
I grew out 9 or ten Brandy boy F2 last fall and none were red. Parentage is nearly certainly two pink PL. I am trying for what ever looks good that comes out of this cross, not just a replica of BB(although it is awesome). What Ive seen... Variable fruit size, ribbing, and DTM. All tasted great.The one I will be growing ten of this fall is from a plant that produced nothing but 1lb+ excellent pinks(16 or so). We will see how the F3 turns out. I have another that was really early and superb on the small side 6-8 oz. Don't got enough room to work with this one, but if any dedicated Tvillain wants to give it a shot PM me. Vince
__________________
Vince |
May 28, 2008 | #7 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 630
|
Quote:
But now that I think of it, isn't Better Boy an F1 anyway? If it is a mix of the two, it seems that the Better Boy would have had to been inbred for it to be stable enough to produce a uniform F1 with the Brandywine. Am I right about this? This is all theoretical anyway, so I guess it doesn't matter. I am a total amateur when it comes to breeding tomatoes. |
|
May 28, 2008 | #8 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
Yes, Better Boy is an F1. So is Big Boy an F1. So is Ultra Boy an F1. Lots of boys out there.
But my point is, knowing George Ball at Burpee, that no parentage will ever be revealed as is true with all other proprietary F1 hybrids developed. I'm pretty sure that Peto Seed, now a part of Seminins, probably does the Burpee hybrids but the same would be true of other hybrids developed by Peto, Novartis, Sakata, and on and on. It's a rough world out there competition wise so that's why parental genetic inputs are never revealed. Just go to Google, enter NCSU cultivars, scroll down to tomatoes and take a look.
__________________
Carolyn |
May 28, 2008 | #9 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Farmington, Nm
Posts: 450
|
Wow! I hit print before I checked how long that list was! That's some air travel reading material! Thanks for the link Carolyn
__________________
I moved! |
May 28, 2008 | #10 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
Suze, I did some searching trying to find mention of a red BB fruit and I'm not done yet, but below is a post that Mischka wrote back in 2006:
I didn't see your post Craig. ( Craig was asking if BB was really hybrid, CJM) I can tell you that it is a hybrid from what I've seen here. I grew 10 F2 plants last year. I don't have my notes handy but I do remember that 4 of the plants were RL with fruits similar to Eva Purple Ball. 2 of the plants were almost identical to the F1's - I saved seed from these. I plan on growing 10 F3's this year; weather and God willing. :wink: ***** Getting out RL plants from BB I've referred to before. How come? Lots of conjecture in this thread mainly from 2006 with no resolution.
__________________
Carolyn |
May 28, 2008 | #11 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 630
|
Carolyn, I checked out some of the NCSU web pages having to do with tomatoes. They certainly do have a lot of legal restrictions and forms and whatnot. I understand they are protective of their work, but I really don't agree with corporations owning plant genetics.
|
May 28, 2008 | #12 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
Quote:
The corporations don't own genetics at all. They spend lots of time and money developing the various OP accessions that are in each of the two breeding lines that result in modern F1's and there can be up to 4 individual parental inputs in each of those two lines. I see no reason why they should divulge the specific parental inputs that they've developed for the simple reason that they're in business and the F1 tomato area is a HUGE business and very competetive. Especially in the Netherlands where most of the large commercial tomato breeders are. So they don't own genetics at all, rather, it's the use of the varieties and strains and accessions that an individual company has that leads them to be able to develop what they do. Does that make sense?
__________________
Carolyn |
|
May 28, 2008 | #13 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 5,346
|
I am convinced, purely from tasting (which I realize is not empirical evidence), that Brandy Boy is derived from Brandywine, but is not Brandywine in a new wrapper.
The fact that the two plants look so similar (Brandy Boy leaves have a bit more serration, the larger leaves look like oven mitts vs. the Brandywine leaves which are completely rounded), and have the same growth habits. Brandy Boy has an excellent flavor, but not identical to Brandywine. The fact that Mischka and Suze have both grown F1 and F5 side-by-side and found them to be identical tells me that either Brandy Boy is NOT a hybrid and they are just pulling our leg (and our wallet to the tune of $2.50 for 10-15 seeds), or it is a hybrid with so little variation in the F2, that there is really no reason to buy seeds of it again. So now I am down to being dependent on the seed companies for just Jet Star and Sungold. By the way, Brandywine and Brandy Boy which are 3 plants apart in my garden, each have 10 fruit including ones I've picked. The Brandywine fruits are monstrous in comparison. Brandy Boy has yet to distinguish itself from Brandywine for me as far as noticeably increased productivity.
__________________
[SIZE="3"]I've relaunched my gardening website -- [B]TheUnconventionalTomato.com[/B][/SIZE] * [I][SIZE="1"]*I'm not allowed to post weblinks so you'll have to copy-paste it manually.[/SIZE][/I] |
May 28, 2008 | #14 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Zone 4 Lake Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 967
|
Quote:
|
|
May 28, 2008 | #15 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 630
|
Hmm...Maybe I just misunderstood. Perhaps I could find the links and you could clarify what all those forms are for. I agree that they should be able to keep their breeding programs secret.
I do know that certain corporations (and that may not apply in this case) do claim ownership of the genetics of their plants - certain kinds of corn come to mind. I was just reading about a federal court case along this line. But maybe this was GM corn or something. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|