Information and discussion for successfully cultivating potatoes, the world's fourth largest crop.
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 23, 2013 | #15 | |
Crosstalk™ Forum Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 8407 18th Ave West 7-203 Everett, Washington 98204
Posts: 1,157
|
Patently false? I beg to differ.....
I would rather trust Idaho, Oregon, and Virginia studies on seed piece size as to yield and tuber size. I know these guys in Idaho... http://www.cals.uidaho.edu/edcomm/pdf/CIS/CIS1031.pdf Seed piece size...spacing...and yield... [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/cX6ucJG.png?1[/IMG] Physiological age of tubers [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Xm6zPMs.png?1[/IMG] The following abstract by Ken Rykbost is one that I know about since I have been to the Klamath potato station and tallked with Mr. Rykbost and even spent an evening with him at his home. I seen the difference in the plots as to the size of seed piece and tuber size. Abstract Effect of seed piece size on performance of three potato varieties in the Klamath Basin of Oregon Quote:
There could be some neat algorithms if one could do an overlay of Response of physiologically young and old seed and tuber seed piece size and or whole planted tubers. Tie that with apical dominance and you would have a complicated but repeatable approach to potato production even in the home garden. |
|
|
|