Tomatoville® Gardening Forums


Notices

Member discussion regarding the methods, varieties and merits of growing tomatoes.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 31, 2009   #1
amideutch
Tomatovillian™
 
amideutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Germany 49°26"N 07°36"E
Posts: 5,041
Default Interesting Article from Scientific American

Somebody posted this over at Dave's. Title is "How to Grow a Better Tomato: The Case Against Heirloom Tomatoes."
Here's the link.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...rloom-tomatoes
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways,
totally worn out, shouting ‘...Holy Crap .....What a ride!'
amideutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #2
celestina
Tomatovillian™
 
celestina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 153
Default

Yes interesting. Yet, I'm not very interested in buying seeds of a hybrid tomato and throwing away the original OP seed. Might I try it to see what it tastes like, compare it to the OP variety--sure.

This was a strage statement by Chetelat-- wonder what he's talking about?

"Any plant that sets only two fruits, as heirlooms typically do,"
celestina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #3
BattleOfBennington
Tomatovillian™
 
BattleOfBennington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 76
Default

Ami -

but what would be better? Increase the Brix through better care of the soil and getting rid of all those petrolium product fertilizers people use.

If you care for the plant in a more wholistic way, it will be heathier and able to fend off illness, etc - just like the human body.

Funny how these folks spend tons of money to re-invent the wheel.


Quote:
Originally Posted by amideutch View Post
Somebody posted this over at Dave's. Title is "How to Grow a Better Tomato: The Case Against Heirloom Tomatoes."
Here's the link.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...rloom-tomatoes
BattleOfBennington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #4
ContainerTed
Tomatovillian™
 
ContainerTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 6a - NE Tennessee
Posts: 4,538
Default

Holy Misinformation, Batman!!!!!!!!!!

Scientific American should rename itself to "Monsanto's Prosthesis". Whoever authored that article, (probably dictated by Monsanto) needs to get out of the house more.

I think an email campaign to President Obama and the First Lady should begin immediately.

How many times have chemical criminals like Monsanto been allowed to do their thing and hundreds of Americans end up with medical problems or even in cemetaries??

While the discussion on genes was okay, the rest of it was total and complete "HOGWASH".

Ted
__________________
Ted
________________________
Owner & Sole Operator Of
The Muddy Bucket Farm
and Tomato Ranch





ContainerTed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #5
feldon30
Tomatovillian™
 
feldon30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 5,346
Default

It's Scientific American we're talking about here. Anything that takes Science over Nuance is going to win out. I don't think it's a conspiracy. I think it is Scientists beating the Science drum.

I will say clearly that this guy clearly has no idea how to grow a tomato.

Quote:
Perhaps that's the price to pay for a good, flavorful fruit? Hardly, Chetelat says, because the heirlooms' taste may have less to do with its genes than with the productivity of the plant and the growing environment. Any plant that sets only two fruits, as heirlooms typically do, is bound to produce juicier, sweeter and more flavorful fruit than varieties that set 100, as commercial types do. Plus, heirlooms are sold ripened on the vine, a surefire way to get tastier results than allowing them to mature on the shelf.
Never had a problem getting 10, 15, 20, or even 30 tomatoes off heirloom tomato plants, and they still taste incredible compared to commercial varieties in my experience.

If he is only getting 2 tomatoes, then clearly he is doing something wrong.
__________________
[SIZE="3"]I've relaunched my gardening website -- [B]TheUnconventionalTomato.com[/B][/SIZE] *

[I][SIZE="1"]*I'm not allowed to post weblinks so you'll have to copy-paste it manually.[/SIZE][/I]
feldon30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #6
organichris
Tomatovillian™
 
organichris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 630
Default

I didn't understand this statement:

"Genetics work will also point the way to sturdier, more flavorful tomatoes—albeit hybrid varieties whose sterile seeds cannot be passed down from generation to generation but must be purchased anew by growers each season."

I understand that you'd have to buy the seeds every year to get the same exact kind of tomato, but why would the seeds be sterile?
organichris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #7
travis
Tomatovillian™
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feldon30 View Post

I will say clearly that this guy clearly has no idea how to grow a tomato.

If he is only getting 2 tomatoes, then clearly he is doing something wrong.
Who says he actually is growing tomatoes

Or maybe he's not growing actual tomatoes

But he gets close to the truth in one respect. Short determinates that give huge and concentrated yields have a much higher ratio of fruit to leaf mass, therefore cannot produce and transfer as much sugar and flavor to each fruit. Conversely, indeterminates that produce tomatoes over extended seasons, one cluster every third or fourth internode rather than every other internode, distribute the sugars and flavors on a more measured schedule and in larger amounts to each fruit as it develops over the extended season rather than to the entire crop load in a week or two.

A lot of the rest of the article is bunk.
travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #8
feldon30
Tomatovillian™
 
feldon30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 5,346
Default

Do you harvest tomatoes over an extended season? I guess I haven't been that lucky. I get tomatoes May 21 -> about the end of June.
__________________
[SIZE="3"]I've relaunched my gardening website -- [B]TheUnconventionalTomato.com[/B][/SIZE] *

[I][SIZE="1"]*I'm not allowed to post weblinks so you'll have to copy-paste it manually.[/SIZE][/I]
feldon30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #9
WVTomatoMan
Tomatovillian™
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Virginia - Zone 6
Posts: 594
Default

I had a difficult time believing I was reading such misinformation in a Scientific American article. I was in such disbelief that I actually verified that the link went to Scientific American and wasn't a spoof.

Randy
WVTomatoMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #10
travis
Tomatovillian™
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 2,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feldon30 View Post
Do you harvest tomatoes over an extended season? I guess I haven't been that lucky. I get tomatoes May 21 -> about the end of June.
I may not be saying that correctly or clearly.

What I mean is tomatoes produced on modern hybrid determinates bred for the commecial fresh eating market are produced on bush plants developing inflorescences every other internode mostly all at once on side shoots. This means there is a huge load of tomatoes all at once drawing sugars and flavors from a limited factory of leaves. That limits the available sugar and flavor to each fruit.

Tomatoes on indeterminate vines are produced in a more gradual series from inflorescences every third or fourth internode and benefit from sugar and flavor transfer from the leaf factory in higher amounts to each fruit over a longer fruit production period.

And yes, I agree with the article that generally speaking, modern hybrid market tomatoes produce more fruit than heirloom type indeterminates. I said generally. And that can be a good thing when it comes to flavor.
travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #11
Vince
Tomatovillian™
 
Vince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 942
Default

This is an extremely embarrassing article for this magazine.

Ted here is another possible name "Pseudo Scientific American".

I didn't realize recessive genes were "inferior".

I stopped reading the article at the part where they talked about hybrid seeds being sterile. Total Nonsense.
__________________
Vince
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #12
carolyn137
Moderator Emeritus
 
carolyn137's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
Default

Ami, you beat me to it. I also saw that link at DG and intended to post it here but stopped on the way at GW to post it there as well and do a couple of posts, one of which required a lot of Googling.

I have a set order in which I read where I read and it's DG, then GW, then Tville, then maybe idig, and then the SSE message site. Actually very scientific having to do with where they're located in my faves.

The amount of misinformation is incredible.

I know a couple of the persons referred to in the article and so help me, if they knew what was said in that article I know they'd be very upset.

Dr. Esther van der Kammp is someone I've been in contact with for over a year and, well, I'll just have to come back later and try to explain myself.

F2 seeds from hybrids are sterile? Whoa, I guess I've been growing some sterile F2's in the past. They must have unsterilized themselves somehow......a true miracle.
__________________
Carolyn
carolyn137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #13
Wi-sunflower
Tomatovillian™
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,591
Default

Yup, I too am currently growing a whole lot of F-2, F-3 and F-4 seeds collected from hybrid plants.

And as far as not getting more than 2 tomatoes off his heirlooms, I have some pics somewhere showing buckets of tomatoes still on the plants after we had our first frost. Kellogg's Breakfast, Rose, Peron and Marianna's Peace were some that have been very productive for me.

Carol
Wi-sunflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #14
creister
Tomatovillian™
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Abilene, TX zone 7
Posts: 1,478
Default

As my grandma used to say, "hogwash". I guess all of us must be growing some genetic anomollies, as on a bad season I can get more than 2 fruit.

Tomatoes in the store taste horrible, are hard, etc.. Sounds to me, like, maybe seed saving is taking away some of the business of the seed companies.
creister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31, 2009   #15
amideutch
Tomatovillian™
 
amideutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Germany 49°26"N 07°36"E
Posts: 5,041
Default

As long as there are those of us that will continue to perpetuate and promote the OP/Heirloom varieties and organizations like SSE I'm not to worried about companies like Monsanto and others doing their genetic mumbo jumbo. Let them develop their hybrids which are geared for the commercial market. We as heirloom tomato growers know better what is best for us and our plants. Some of the statements made in the article showed their ignorance about tomatoes in general. More and more OP crosses are showing up each year, improving the established lines and developing new ones right in the backyards of common everyday gardeners. When the day comes that a catastrophic event does occur, it will be the seed vaults filled with OP varieties that will save us, not hybrids. Ami
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways,
totally worn out, shouting ‘...Holy Crap .....What a ride!'

Last edited by amideutch; April 18, 2009 at 03:14 AM.
amideutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


★ Tomatoville® is a registered trademark of Commerce Holdings, LLC ★ All Content ©2022 Commerce Holdings, LLC ★