Forum area for discussing hybridizing tomatoes in technical terms and information pertinent to trait/variety specific long-term (1+ years) growout projects.
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
July 6, 2012 | #1 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 568
|
Patent application for harvest of high solids tomatoes
I found this interesting. Crossing to a specific S. hirsutum line allowed late harvest of wrinkled tomatoes with a very high solids (low moisture) content. The trait of interest apparently allows "drying" on the vine without microbial degradation.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...S=PN/7,119,261 Last edited by frogsleap farm; July 6, 2012 at 01:24 PM. Reason: link was inoperable |
July 6, 2012 | #2 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,250
|
Keep trying Frog, the link does not work yet. The patent number is enough to find it.
DarJones |
July 6, 2012 | #3 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 568
|
|
July 6, 2012 | #4 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 5,346
|
When you put a link into a blog or forum, the software displays those links shortened with "...". If you then copy that URL and paste it somewhere else, it's broken. You have to right-click on the link and choose "Copy Link Location". Then you get the real address.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...1&RS=7,119,261 So it's Lycopersicon hirsutum, a wrinkled wild tomato, crossed with the garden tomato. I didn't know you could patent something that can happen accidentally in your backyard.
__________________
[SIZE="3"]I've relaunched my gardening website -- [B]TheUnconventionalTomato.com[/B][/SIZE] * [I][SIZE="1"]*I'm not allowed to post weblinks so you'll have to copy-paste it manually.[/SIZE][/I] |
July 6, 2012 | #5 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: England
Posts: 512
|
Yes, it does sound a little close to biopiracy. I worry that indigenous farmers somewhere may have been growing something similar for decades and now find themselves in a situation where they could be sued for patent infringement.
|
July 6, 2012 | #6 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 568
|
The wild relatives of the tomato have been a rich source of useful genetic variation. Although S. hirsutum and S. peruvianum lack the attributes to make them an attractive crop plant per se, they have been a rich source of trait genes useful in tomato breeding - for example multiple disease resistance genes from related species have been transferred to cultivated tomato. There is nothing wrong with mining related relatives for useful genes. I'm surprised about the granted patent though - normally the USPTO does not allow the patenting of naturally occurring genes/traits.
|
July 7, 2012 | #7 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,250
|
Technically, the patent is not for the trait involved. It is for the line that was developed with commercial fruit production that also expresses the fruit drying traits. But arguing it in court could be difficult.
Various available lines of tomatoes already express this drying trait to some degree. Stupice for example will shrivel as it dries. The same for Hires Rootstock. DarJones |
|
|