|
![]() |
#1 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alabama 7.5 or 8 depends on who you ask
Posts: 727
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cheektowaga, NY
Posts: 2,466
|
![]()
I agree, it can be confusing and there are more and more amendment products coming out all the time with bacterial and fungal inoculants included as technology and mass production techniques have made them very inexpensive.
Almost all inoculants are delivered in spore form since they can be microencapsulated and kept dormant for long periods of time in a dry or liquid carrier. All fungi reproduce by spores, many bacteria do but not all. I think it's only accurate to say that bacteria and fungi are ubiquitous in the environment, what beneficial species as well as pathogenic species may be present in native soils will vary with climate, soil type and cultural practices. Cultivated soils for crop production are many times the most abused and damaging to soil life. Excessive tillage, chemical salt fertilizers, fungicides and pesticides can inhibit or kill off many beneficial species including higher forms of life like earthworms, protozoa, beneficial nematodes, mites, and insects that are all important to the Soil Food Web. Using inoculants are a good way to cheat a little and introduce known species that will be beneficial to the soil and plants faster. Composts help that too. Your fish tank has is like soil too, it contains bacteria, fungi, algae and other critters also, maybe not all good ones. Being a closed system it takes steps to keep toxins from building up which can kill your fish. Fish waste contains ammonia and nitrites which can get to toxic levels for the fish. Your plants like that fish water in part because those compounds can be converted to ammonium and nitrates by soil bacteria. I found this, there is even a live culture of Nitrifying Bacteria you can buy that does just that in an aquarium. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,488
|
![]()
Robbie,
There are 10's of thousands of bacteria, fungi, and other microbiology in every square foot of soil. Most are beneficial, a few are not. But they vary widely in the degree to which they are beneficial. When you inoculate you are simply making sure the best of the best (that we know of) get an advantage first. This helps insure that the few bad guys have a disadvantage in their quest for domination. It is not 100%, but it does help. Theoretically, in a perfect world, in perfect soil, you wouldn't have to inoculate at all. As far as aquarium water goes, I use it too. I think it is a good use for the water I have to change anyway. But I doubt it is actually all that significant a difference. Sure there are a few trace nutrients in very trace amounts. However, I seriously doubt it is really all that important. The soil is the biggie.
__________________
Scott AKA The Redbaron "Permaculture is a philosophy of working with, rather than against nature; of protracted & thoughtful observation rather than protracted & thoughtless labour; & of looking at plants & animals in all their functions, rather than treating any area as a single-product system." Bill Mollison co-founder of permaculture |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston, TX - 9a
Posts: 211
|
![]()
So.. I've been culturing a certain biological antifungal product that many of us have found extremely useful. And it's been really successful! It's a streptomycete. I'm using a submerged culture technique, inoculating directly from the product with each batch, and using the product immediately. So basically, this allows the product to go a lot further - but you still need to buy it.
I've cultured 5 times now successfully, with a few failures. I'm using a 5 gallon bucket filled to about 3.5 gallons and an aquarium air pump with two airstones (each a cube of 1 inch). Success is incredibly obvious because of the sweet smell streptomycetes produce. The effects on plants are pretty unmistakable as well. I've tried a few different "recipes". The important thing is to keep nitrogen relatively low, use no simple sugars, and as few simple carbohydrates as possible. This favors actinobacteria over other bacteria. The most successful recipe is below. 1/4 cup crab or shrimp shell (provides chitin along with other macro and micro nutrients) 1 tbsp vinegar (this brings my tap water to slightly below neutral pH) 2 quarts of tapwater (my tapwater is hard, high in sodium, and alkaline) 1/4 cup cornmeal (carbohydrate and other nutrients) 1 tsp brewers yeast powder (provides full spectrum of nutrients and possible minor growth factors) Chitin as the primary nitrogen source promotes the production of antifungal enzymes/metabolites and favors actinobacteria. For actinobacteria, the brewers yeast powder may actually be counterproductive. Actinobacteria are well adapted to situations with very little nutrition, and perhaps no exogenous growth factors, unlike many bacteria. However, it is a standard component of many culture mediums. I haven't yet experimented with leaving it out, but I will. Do not add molasses, honey, sugar, or anything remotely sweet. It's just not necessary for actinobacteria, and will likely result in other bacteria taking over the culture. I've tried. The smell was horrible. Cornmeal is very, very cheap at feed stores. I powder the ingredients in a spice grinder if necessary. Option 1) Tyndallization - Mix the solids and liquids in a stockpot. Bring to a low boil for thirty minutes, replacing water as needed. Let it sit overnight, covered. Boil again for thirty minutes and it's ready to use. Pressure cookers used to scare me, so this is what I would have done in the past and have tried twice with success on this organism. Allowing the liquid to sit overnight promotes the germination of dormant spores that weren't killed by the first boiling. The second boiling kills most organisms before they have a chance to sporulate again. Option 2) Ghetto Autoclave - Stick everything in a pressure cooker and let it go to three whistles or whatever makes you happy. Add extra water to account for the lost steam. Can be ready to use within 30 minutes of mixing. Now you just dump everything in a well cleaned 5 gallon bucket and dilute to about 3.5 gallons. Turn on the pump, and add a tsp of the product. Wait three days or so. Smell it when you get impatient to reassure yourself. Airline tubing, bubble stones, and the 5 gallon bucket should be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected after every use. Note that the air you're blowing into the culture is obviously not disinfected or sterilized. Apparently the streptomycete has enough of a headstart that this is not a problem. I haven't had to use any chemical fungicides so far this season! Last edited by greentiger87; June 13, 2013 at 11:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Eastern Suburb of Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,313
|
![]() Quote:
Based on what I'd read of AACT, I was planning on brewing a 24-48 hour batch that might look like this: - .5-1-cup sulfur-less Molasses - 2-4 cup worm castings - .5 cup Neptune's Harvest Seaweed solution (or the fish/seaweed) - Some Humic and/or Fulvic acids - Frass? (Would that be a good substitute for your - Some kind of inoculant; options included: + Acinovate (Streptomyces lydicus WYEC 108*) + Great White (http://www.plant-success.com/index.p...corrhizae.html) + Biotamax (Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma koningii, Trichoderma polysporum, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus laterosporus, Bacillus licheniformus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Paenibacillus polymyxa) + Something else? As you can see, I'm new to this, and my personality tends towards overdoing it. Since I don't know which of the above ingredients to use to effect an outcome, I'm throwing everything into the brew. Well, then I came across your post around trying to promote Actinobacteria, and I have to question if I'm on course. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the ingredents I have listed above, which make sense, which do not. How much. Etc. Also, can you give online sources for the ingredients you used? I want to make sure I'm using the same type of "stuff" if I give your brew a try this weekend. BTW, when you write, "Turn on the pump, and add a tsp of the product...." to what "product" are you referring? Is it the inoculant? Thanks! Naysen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Central Indiana 6a/41
Posts: 131
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Russel USDA: Zone 6a, Sunset Zone 41 - 15 miles NW of Indianapolis, IN I had a problem with slugs. I tried using beer but it didn't work, until I gave it to the slugs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Central Indiana 6a/41
Posts: 131
|
![]() Quote:
My understanding is that Myco will keep for about 2 years under favorable conditions, but if you use a lot of it, you could just make it every year for the following growing season. Once activated in the soil, it can live only about 48 hours without a host. I had planned on doing exactly this but could not find a small quantity, say 5 pounds, of Bahia grass. The project eventually got pushed to the back of the bus but I would still like to try it. Hope this helps. Russel
__________________
Russel USDA: Zone 6a, Sunset Zone 41 - 15 miles NW of Indianapolis, IN I had a problem with slugs. I tried using beer but it didn't work, until I gave it to the slugs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston, TX - 9a
Posts: 211
|
![]()
Naysen -
The product I was referring to was Actinovate. No worries, I have a similar personality. I know it's hard to do, but one of the most important things as far as success with culturing organisms like these is to *not* overdo the recipe. Each set of bacteria will have conditions in which they thrive. It is very easy for the hobbyist to create a growth medium that is far too rich for their purposes. Too rich media can backfire in multiple ways (I can elaborate if you want), and often promotes the dominance of contaminants. When in doubt, dilute. Do research on the specific microorganism you want to grow on Google scholar before you start experimenting. Since there's no way for you to directly test your final product, optimizing your growth media to select for what you want becomes very important. Throwing everything but the kitchen sink in at once is *not* a good idea. Resist the urge. Trust me, I can empathize. Bacillus species are mostly non-fastidious, meaning they don't need any special growth factors to succeed. However, they do best in aerobic conditions. They can be reliably grown on something as simple as Potato Broth (the liquid left behind when you boil unpeeled potato slices in water for a while). Trichoderma can be grown in liquid broth, but it will struggle to compete against contaminants. Without adding antibiotics and other selection factors, you'll probably be wasting inoculant. However, Trichoderma species will grow vigorously on moist, but solid media. The growth is clearly visible as well, which is reassuring. From what I've read, Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma don't antagonize each other in controlled studies on agar. Combinations of Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma complement each other when applied to the plant root syste. However, these studies were on specific strains of the subtilis species only. Since Bacillus species are used as antagonists for fungal pathogens, it's not unreasonable to think that they could outcompete Trichoderma if they were vying for the same resources. Actinomycetes are very non-fastidious. They can thrive in very low-nutrient situations where other organisms struggle. The Actinovate strain is extremely vigorous, which is likely making up for the fact that my approach is non-ideal and non-sterile. Adding simple carbohydrates like molasses, in non-sterile conditions, will promote the growth of undesired and potentially pathogenic bacteria in a liquid broth situation. This is a overall opinion from the my reading of the research. A very small amount of molasses might be helpful for Bacillus, but not for Trichoderma or any Actinomycete. The majority of mycorrhizal species cannot be cultured in vitro. They need living plants to multiply. See posts above for details. Adding Great White to your tea, as expensive as it is, is a huge waste. Frass is best thought of as an inoculant, rather than a nutrient source. Adding it along with another inoculant is overkill. Worm castings also serve as an inoculant, along with providing nutrients. For the purpose of growing specific microorganisms, adding seaweed, humic/fulvic acids, worm castings, or frass all introduce unknown variables that are unecessary. They might still be good for plants, but not for the purpose we're talking about. Add them later. I know this is contrary to much of the information on the web, but the research shows that Aerated Compost Tea is *not* effective as a foliar spray. The unknown composition is the main issue. Anaerobic teas of manure products and chicken litter have shown some consistent effectiveness in field trials, though there are still pathogen issues. Aerobic teas are attractive because the smell nicer, and *feel* like you're really doing something. And of course, people can make money selling you equipment. This is why I prefer attempting to culture single organisms if I'm going to go to the trouble of aerating my tea. The next best thing to is to use an inoculant that you know is rich in a specific kind of organism, and then compose your media to select for them as well. For example, insect frass is known to be rich in chitin-degrading organisms as well as entomopathogenic organisms. Last edited by greentiger87; June 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Eastern Suburb of Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,313
|
![]()
GreenTiger, great reply! For some reason, this thread was not added to my watch list on my posting, so I almost lost it. I guess it was too easy to assume we could just bubble some water with any number of innoculants floating in it to end up with liquid gold for the garden.
I was actually researching AACT myself this morning, unrelated to this thread response, and I came across several WSU study aggregates purporting AACT advocates are propagating a myth, particularly so far as its uses for repressing disease. Here are some of the links: http://puyallup.wsu.edu/~linda%20cha...3rd%20time.pdf http://puyallup.wsu.edu/~linda%20cha...ea%20again.pdf http://puyallup.wsu.edu/~linda%20cha...post%20tea.pdf http://puyallup.wsu.edu/~linda%20cha...CompostTea.pdf Can you provide a link or finer description of the Brewers yeast that you used as well as corn meal type? Any update on the results? I think you should start a separate post dedicated to your recipes and the reasoning behind your TAACT (targeted AACT) experiments? I think it would be good to have more of the community test out specific recipes and perform experiments with foliar-spraying/soil-drench to see if there are any apparent benefits against xyz (w/ control). I look forward to hearing more from you. Thanks! -naysen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cheektowaga, NY
Posts: 2,466
|
![]()
Granted, compost tea as a foliar disease control is a crap shoot. There is no way of knowing if a particular tea brew has the right species of microbes in sufficient numbers to be effective against certain leaf, stem or fruit pathogens. Of course targeting applications with specific microbes with known pathogen fighting abilities that can live above ground on plant surfaces makes more sense.
Compost and other types of teas are more valuable as a ground application where they can greatly help restore balanced biology to depleted and abused soils or soil-less container mixes. I think it's important to grasp that teas are not just about bacteria and fungi, but it's also about protozoa and bacteria and fungi feeding nematodes which are critical to nutrient cycling. Without them and larger critters like earthworms and arthropods plants grown under organic conditions would never get the all the nutrients they need. Compost teas are a pretty complicated subject that has nothing to do with haphazardly throwing everything but the kitchen sink into a brew. Dr. Elaine Ingham's "The Compost Tea Brewing Manual" is required reading for anyone wanting to understand the biology and experiment with compost teas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Eastern Suburb of Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,313
|
![]()
Ray, thanks for the comments and link. I'm into reading it now.
Much appreciated. -naysen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston, TX - 9a
Posts: 211
|
![]()
I've had my reservations about Elaine Ingham in the past. After reading more of her work though, I've come to respect her perspective.
But as she strongly implies in manual above, the AACT she's teaching how to make is really meant for commercial and market growers and farmers. It's not always practical for even a small grower with just several acres of plants to incorporate compost into their soil, or mulch heavily with organic matter. So good compost tea, applied to the soil, is highly beneficial. But for the average suburban/backyard gardener, the much better option is to aggressively amend with organic material. Adding compost tea on top of that (into the ground) doesn't make much sense to me. My raised beds, for example, contain no purposely added inorganic "soil". It's all compost and mulch. There's hundreds of feet of clay below that for plants to sink their roots into, so there's no reason for me to add more. To say that the "soil" of my raised beds is teeming with life is a understatement. I suspect the same can be said of most backyard gardeners that are trying to implement organic practices. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Eastern Suburb of Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,313
|
![]()
Well maybe off-topic, but I figured I post some pics of my tea brewer in action. A buddy of mine ordered the bulkhead, and I had the food grade barrel ready for use. It went together pretty easy with the two of us working on it. The tea prep time was a bit high. I didn't have all the products that GT88 used to try out his recipe (nor has he reported back on the efficacy of the trial), so after reading through the entire Ingham manual, I tried to match one of her bacteria/fungal 50/50 recipes. In the end, it kind of did feel like I threw everything but the kitchen sink into the mix. I hope this isn't a disaster. I did go very light on the food (1/20th what the Brix package recommended).
My recipe is documented here: http://s1360.photobucket.com/user/z_...acb1b.jpg.html I'm probably fighting a Verticillium or Fusarium issue in my beds, so I'm hoping the bacteria might help push out the bad guys. -naysen ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cheektowaga, NY
Posts: 2,466
|
![]()
Practically everything but the kitchen sink I'd say.
Naysen, why all the Mycogrow and Great White in the mix. Seems redundant and unnecessary and better to apply those inoculants directly to the soil and roots. What exactly is the Brix product? Is that a brand of molasses? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Eastern Suburb of Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,313
|
![]()
More than just the myco-fungi, Myco-grow and Great white listed a large number of "Beneficial" bacteria in their ranks. Since it's been several months since I used those products (and a few of my plantings were not inoculated at plant out), and I didn't know what the compost soil products included, I included the two myco-centric products. There is a bit of a contradiction between what I've read here in this thread on the ability of teas to reproduce fungal elements (not easy) vs. what I read in Dr. Ingham's paper, where she suggests it is a matter of having the right components in the mix and generally requires longer brew times. Here's one basic starting point recipe she gave for a 50/50 bacteria/fungi type tea:
Equal Ratio Fungi to Bacteria Tea (based on 50 gal tea) - 15 pounds (7 kg) 1:1 fungal to bacterial biomass ratio compost - 16 ounces (500 mL) humicacids - 8 ounces (250 g) soluble kelp Fish hydrolysate, soybean meal, feathermeal, oatmeal, or other high complex protein materials (see labelon packages), fruit pulp, fish emulsion Add nothing with a preservative or antibiotic in it! Humic acids select for beneficial fungi, but any fungal food could be substituted here. Make certain to obtain a mixture containing many humic acids, rather than a limited set (ie., 3 to5 humic acids). Rockdusts, rock powders, or rock flours can be beneficial as well,although these grainy materials can harm mechanical pumps. Fish hydrolysate should be tested for their ability to serve as fungal food resources before using extensively.Fish emulsions do not have the oils that help fungi grow, so an emulsion is more beneficial as a bacterial food than a fungal food. I didn't mention that it's been very hot in the garage where I've had the tea brewing. (100+ most of the time) The paper indicated there were two schools of thought on ideal temperatures: 1st) suggesting a specific range of temp as optimal for micro-organism growth (much lower than 100F); and the 2nd suggesting the brew should be made at the temperature in which the organisms will be administered. So, obviously, I'm banking on #2. I had a foot of frothy foam at the top of my brew yesterday before I removed 10llb of 30lb for injection watering in the evening (48hr brew). The remaining 20lb are still bubbling in the garage, and I should use them as a foliar and soil drench later this evening. The tea has a mixture of a kind of sweet grass smoothy mixed with a kind of wet sock, gym in the rainy wintertime scent. I didn't find the wet sock pleasant, but I'm hoping it's just the Neptune's Harvest fish stuff that I added. It wasn't actually that terrible a smell and not too intense. -naysen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|