Member discussion regarding the methods, varieties and merits of growing tomatoes.
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
April 7, 2012 | #1 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: zone 5b northwest connecticut
Posts: 2,570
|
fish lake oxheart dtm?
tatiana's database says mid season. i'd like days. i know it is an estimate but is it 75, 80, 85?
kath i got the seeds from you and you from carolyn iirc, i'm sure i asked you but what did they do for you? thanks, tom
__________________
I need a hero I’m holding out for a hero ‘til the end of the night He’s gotta be strong And he’s gotta be fast And he’s gotta be fresh from the fight I need a hero I’m holding out for a hero ‘til the morning light He’s gotta be sure And it’s gotta be soon And he’s gotta be larger than life |
April 7, 2012 | #2 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: zone 6b, PA
Posts: 5,664
|
Plant out day was 5/13- picked first fruit on 7/20. So it was more early than mid-season for me.
kath |
April 7, 2012 | #3 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 189
|
I'm moving towards early, mid, and late season instead of DTM. I found DTM didn't match my experience with the plants, particularly, from 75 to 80 days. Theoretically later plants were earlier than some of the shorter DTM plants. When you consider that DTM depends on conditions, putting a number on DTM is a mugs game. I would suggest: early 50-70, mid 65-80, late 75-90. Tania does the early/mid/late and Dave's Garden has a range 60-80 days for a large selection of tomatoes. (I didn't check if I'm off 5 days)
|
April 8, 2012 | #4 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 7,068
|
I grew 6 Fish Lake Oxheart plants last year and it was the earliest of all the varieties I planted. My very earliest was 55 days and my latest took only 61 days so I would definitely call it an early tomato. We did have an unusually hot spring last year with temps reaching 100 in May so I'm sure that was a contributing factor. I think in a cooler climate it would take longer but it was still earlier than 110 other varieties I planted last year.
|
April 8, 2012 | #5 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
I'm of the opinion that DTM's are sheer guesstimates b'c there are so many variables ranging from weather in any one season, how you grow your tomatoes, amendments if used and if so, what kind and how much, etc.
Back in 1998 I switched to early, midseason and late season and gave a day range to each of those categories. Glenn at Sandhill did the same thing but I think a little later than I did.
__________________
Carolyn |
April 9, 2012 | #6 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: zone 5b northwest connecticut
Posts: 2,570
|
hey i know i even said that dtm is an estimate but i wanted to know.
after i started this i thought about when i pick tomatoes and the dtm. it's totally useless! i put them out on memorial day and i'm often picking 75-80 dtm tomatoes by the 3rd sometimes 2nd week in july. so that's what, not even 60 days. granted before i grew my tomatoes under shop lights they produced a good 3 weeks later, usually 2nd to 3rd week in august. i liked to have the number for a relative comparison but it is meaningless. so i changed my garden document. for tomatoes i no longer have the dtm listed. i just kept date 1st picked and date 1st eaten for each variety. that's what matters so so long to the dtm boogieman. tom
__________________
I need a hero I’m holding out for a hero ‘til the end of the night He’s gotta be strong And he’s gotta be fast And he’s gotta be fresh from the fight I need a hero I’m holding out for a hero ‘til the morning light He’s gotta be sure And it’s gotta be soon And he’s gotta be larger than life |
April 16, 2012 | #7 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 4,743
|
I like the Rutgers scale:
same as Rutgers earlier than Rutgers later than Rutgers way earlier than Rutgers much later than Rutgers
__________________
-- alias |
April 16, 2012 | #8 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA Zone 7, Sunset 5
Posts: 931
|
Yippee! I'm growing Rutgers this year, and I just might use that scale, dice! I'm guessing that at one time that really was an accurate scale of time, due to its popularity. |
April 19, 2012 | #9 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 4,743
|
I remember reading a comment in a GW thread by someone from
Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, somewhere south of the Great Lakes, to the effect that "they only want Rutgers; anything else, you can hardly give them away". (This was someone selling seedlings in a rural area, IIRC.)
__________________
-- alias |
April 20, 2012 | #10 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA Zone 7, Sunset 5
Posts: 931
|
Wow, I thought life had moved on. Rutgers was popular when I was a kid. But they are reliably round and red!
j |
|
|